The administration, though, said a number of safety and logistical issues needed to be resolved.
Email Chad Robichaux, a former special agent with the U. Federal Air Marshall Service, has been here before. Objections to arming pilots following the Islamic terror attacks on September 11, were the same as those being raised against arming teachers.
It just seems to make perfect sense. Under present programs the district asks for volunteers and finds that the response far exceeds their needs.
Just ask John Lott, the author of More Guns, Less Crime, in which he has tracked the growth in the private ownership of firearms with the parallel reduction in gun violence over the past two Arming pilots.
Many teachers already carry concealed while away from school, while eight states allow them to carry on campus as well. Another six states are considering such legislation. Authorized school staffers are extremely well trained in stopping an active killer, and [further] in stopping the bleeding for those who have been injured.
Both of these skill sets save lives. Schools that have armed staff already talk to their local law enforcement to advise them just who on campus is armed.
Carno pointed out that private groups have been raising money and funding part of those costs already. Also, schools regularly pay more money to teachers for taking on extracurricular duties, such as coaching or directing plays, and this would simply be one more extracurricular duty. How much more federal involvement would there be in the implementation of such a program?
Armed Educators and trusted people who work within a school love our students and will protect them. Should get yearly bonus. Up to the states, indeed. Let each school board decide on its own whether or how to implement such a program. The very last thing needed in efforts to thwart future attacks is more federal mandates, rules, and regulations.
If your post does not follow our policy, it will be deleted. No profanity, racial slurs, direct threats, or threatening language. Please post comments in English.
Please keep your comments on topic with the article. If you wish to comment on another subject, you may search for a relevant article and join or start a discussion there.Despite the obvious benefit of arming pilots against terrorist attacks on our airlines, substantial opposition to the program is still being brought by the Air Transport Association and its member carriers.
The most often sited concern is the air carrier’s liability for the actions of a Federal. Jun 16, · Arming % of the pilots, however, can be done. It's an efficient expenditure of tax dollars — pilots pay for more of the costs associated with .
H.R. - Arming Pilots Against Terrorism Act. 1. Modified open rule. 2. Provides one hour of general debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. This activity took place on a related bill, H.R.
(th), possibly in lieu of similar activity on S. (th). S. (th) was a bill in the United States Congress. A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the President to become law.
The Air Force isn’t necessarily known for its small arms programs, but aircrews are about to get a longer range stand-off rifle to use if they are ever shot down behind enemy lines. Unfortunately, the major airlines are opposed to the concept, and have exerted enough pressure on the DOT to officially oppose arming pilots, despite the more than 5, favorable comments.